Hugh Winder Nibley (27 March 1910–24 February 2005) was a gifted writer, a prolific author, a first-class scholar and, above all, a committed member of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Hugh was educated at UCLA (A.B. summa cum laude) and Berkeley (Ph.D. in history). He taught at Claremont Colleges before World War II. During the war he enlisted in the army and served in military intelligence; he was involved in combat on D-day and in Operation Market-Garden. He correctly predicted the Battle of the Bulge. After the war, he was employed at Brigham Young University. For well over a half a century, until his doctor ordered him to stop researching in 2002, he was a permanent fixture in the BYU library.

As a teacher, Hugh was overwhelming. He never insulted the student’s intelligence by assuming that the student did not know the basics, and as a result his lectures assumed a broad and thorough general education on the part of the students which few students even approximated. His lectures were generally rapid-fire and tended to start when the students got in earshot and end when they left. His classes were infamous for their one-question essay finals, upon which the student’s grade depended. Hugh was a fair grader who wanted to see his students thinking for themselves, but he did not believe in grade inflation; many students were surprised to find out the real quality of what they had been producing.

As a scholar, Hugh was able to make important contributions in numerous fields: classics, ancient history, Mormon history, patristics, Book of Mormon studies, and Egyptology. Hugh insisted on reading the relevant primary and secondary sources in the original and could read Arabic, Coptic, Dutch, Egyptian, French, German, Greek, Hebrew, Italian, Latin, Old Norse, Russian and other languages at sight. After years of “grimly systematic reading” he was well familiar with the details but insisted on getting the big picture, without which the details were merely trivia.

As a writer, Hugh was blessed with an ability to turn a phrase and compose on tight deadlines. At the end of the 1960s he was publishing an average of one and a half long, thoroughly researched scholarly articles a month. He had a ready, and sometimes biting, wit. He had the courage to publish on controversial and unpopular topics—like the futility of loyalty oaths in the midst of the McCarthy hearings. Above all, he realized that scholarship was not an end unto itself: “I sent out articles to a wide variety of prestigious journals and they were all printed. So I lost interest: what those people were after is not what I was after. Above all, I could see no point to going on through the years marshaling an ever-lengthening array of titles to stand at attention some day at the foot of an obituary. That is what they were all working for, and they were welcome to it.” “What is worth saving will probably be saved, but that can’t be very much and in this world it is vain to pin one’s hopes on the survival of anything for long. What belongs to the eternities will not be lost; the rest does not interest me very much.”

Nibley shunned the spotlight. He never let himself be carried away by the accolades some accorded him. They were not important to him. He spent the last few years at home with his family and occasional well-wishers.

Through it all, he was absolutely committed to the gospel of Jesus Christ and lived it with great consistency. His son-in-law wrote: “As a member of the Nibley family, I have had the opportunity to observe Hugh Nibley at close range for almost twenty years. . . . I have been astonished by his complete lack of materialism but equally astonished by his generosity. . . . I have likewise seen his deep commitment to the gospel. . . . And I have witnessed his deep faith in the Lord. While he certainly isn’t perfect, Hugh Nibley is one of the most consistent people I have ever met.”